Guidelines for Evaluation of Permanent Physical Impairment of Trunk (Spine) - enabled.in

Guidelines for Evaluation of Permanent Physical Impairment of Trunk (Spine)

Guidelines for various disabilities and procedure for certification:The measurement of loss of function in lower extremity is divided into two components: Mobility and standing components.A fracture of right hip joint bones may affect range of motion of the hip joint.

Locomotor disability is defined as a persons inability to execute distinctive activities associated with moving both himself and objects, from place to place and such inability resulting from affliction of musculoskeletal and/or nervous system.

  • Categories of Locomotor Disability

The categories of locomotor disabilities are enclosed at Annexure-A.

  • Process of Certification

1. Guidelines for Evaluation of Permanent Physical Impairment of Upper Limb

2.Guidelines for Evaluation of permanent physical Impairment in Lower Limb


Basic guidelines:

1. As permenanent physical impairment caused by spinal deformity tends to change over the years, the certificate issued in relation to spine should be reviewed as per the standard format of the certificate given at Annexure -B of Appendix.III.

2. Permanent physical impairment should be awarded in relation to spine and not in relation to whole body.

3. Permanent physical impairment due to neurological deficit in addition to spinal impairment should be added by combining formula. The local effects of the lesions of the spine can be conventionally divided into traumatic and non-traumatic. The percentage of PPI in relation to each situation should be valued as follows:

3.1 TRAUMATIC LESIONS:

3.1.1 Cervical spine injuriesPercentage of PPI in relation to Spine
i) 25% or more compression of one or two adjacent vertebral bodies with No involvement of posterior elements, No nerve root involvement, moderate Neck rigidity and persistent Soreness.20%
ii) Posterior element damage with radiological Evidence of moderate parties dislocation/subluxation including whiplash injury.

A) With fusion healed, No permanent motor or sensory changes

B)Persistent pain with radiologically demonstrable instability.

10%

25%

iii) Severe Dislocation:

a) Fair to good reduction with or without fusion with no residual motor or sensory involvement;

b) Inadequate reduction with fusion and persistent radicular pain

10%

15%

3.1.2. Cervical Intervertebral Disc LesionsPercentage of PPI In relation to Spine
i) Treated case of disc lesion with persistent pain and no neurological deficit10%
ii) Treated case with pain and instability15%

3.1.3. Thoracic and Thoracolumbar Spine Injuries:

i) Compression of less than 50% involving one vertebral body with no neurological manifestation10%
ii) Compression of more than 50% involving single vertebra or more with involvement of posterior elements,healed, no neurological manifestations persistent pain, fusion indicated20%
iii) Same as (b) with fusion, pain only on heavy use of back15%
iv) Radiologically demonstrable instability with fracture or fracture dislocation with persistent pain.30%

3.1.3. Thoracic and Thoracolumbar Spine Injuries:

i) Compression of less than 50% involving one vertebral body with no neurological manifestation10%
ii) Compression of more than 50% involving singlevertebra or more with involvement of posterior elements, healed, no neurological manifestations persistent pain, fusion indicated20%
iii) Same as (b) with fusion, pain only on heavy use of back15%
iv) Radiologically demonstrable instability with fracture or fracture dislocation with persistent pain.30%

3.1.4 Lumbar and Lumbosacral Spine: Fracture

a)Compression of 25% or less of one or two adjacent Vertebral bodies, No definite pattern or neurological Deficit>15%
b)Compression of more than 25% with disruption of Posterior elements, persistent pain and stiffness, healed With or without fusion, inability to lift more than 10 kgs.30%
c)Radiologically demonstrable instability in low lumbar or Lumbosacral spine with pain35%

3.1 5 Disc lesion:

a)Treated case with persistent pain15%
b)Treated case with pain and instability20%
c)Treated case of disc disease with pain activities of lifting moderately modified25%
d)Treated case of disc disease with persistent pain and stiffness, aggravated by heavy lifting necessitating modification of all activities requiring heavy weight lifting30%

3.2 NON TRAUMATIC LESIONS:

3.2.1 Scoliosis:

Basic guidelines – following modification is suggested:- The largest structural curve should be accounted for while calculating the PPI and not the compensatory curve or both structural curves.

3.2.2 Measurement of Spine Deformity:

Cobb’s method for measurement, of angle of curve in the radiograph taken in standing position should be used. The curves have been divided into following groups depending upon the angle of major structural scoliotic deformity.

GroupCobb’s AnglePPI in relation to Spine
I0-20NIL
II21-5010%
III51-10020%
IV101 & above30%

3.2.3 Torso Imbalance:

In addition to the above PPI should also be evaluated in relation the torso imbalance. The torso imbalance should be measured by dropping a plumb line from C7 spine and measuring the distance of plumb line from gluteal crease.

Deviation of Plumb linePPI
Upto 1.5 Cm4%
1.6 – 30 Cm8%
3.1 – 50 Cm16%
5.1 and above32%

3.2.4 Head Tilt over C7 spine PPI

Upto 154%
More than 1510%

3.2.5 Cardiopulmonary Test

In cases with scoliosis of severe type cardiopulmonary function tests and percentage deviation from normal should be assessed by one of the following method whichever seems more reliable clinically at the time of assessment. The value thus obtained may be added by combining formula.

a. Chest ExpansionPPI
4 – 5 Cm.Normal
Less than 4 cm reduction in Chest expansion5% for each cm
No expansion25%

b counting in one breathe:

Breathe CountPPI
More than 40Normal
0-405%
0-3010%
0-2015%
0-1020%
Less than 525%

3.2.6 Associated Problems: To be added directly but the total value of PPI in relation to spine should not exceed 100%.

a) Pain

-mildly interfering with ADL4%
-moderately restricting ADL6%
-severely restricting ADL10%

b) Cosmetic Appearance:

-No obvious disfiguration with clothes onNil
-mild disfigurement2%
-severe disfigurement4%

c) Leg Length Discrepancy.

-First1/2 ” shorteningNil
-Every1/2″ beyond first1/2″4%

d) Neurological deficit – Neurological deficit should be calculated as per established method of evaluation of PPI in such cases. Value thus obtained should be added telescopically using combining formula.

3.3 KYPHOSIS

Evaluation should be done on the similar guidelines as use for scoliosis with the following modifications:

3.3.1 Spinal DeformityPPI
Less than 20Nil
21-4010%
41-6020%
Above 6030%

3.3.2 Torso Imbalance – Plumb line dropped from external ear normally falls at ankle level. The deviation from normal should be measured from ankle anterior joint line to the plumb line.

Less than 5 cm in front of ankle4%
5 to 10 cm in front of ankle8%
10 to 15 cm in front of ankle16%
More than 15 cm in front of ankle32%

(Add directly)

Miscellaneous conditions:

Those conditions of the spine which cause stiffness and pain etc. are rated as follows.

ConditionsPercentage PPI
ASubjective symptoms of pain, no involuntary muscle spasm,, not substantiated by demonstrable structural pathology-0%
BPain, persistent muscles spasm and stiffness of spine, substantiated by mild radiological change.-20%
CSame as B with moderate radiological changes-25%
DSame as B with severe radiological changes involving any one of the regions of spine-30%
ESame as D involving whole spine-40%

Continue reading :

4.Guidelines for Evaluation of PPI in cases of Short Stature/Dwarftsm

5.Guidelines for Evaluation of Permanent Physical Impairment in Amputees

6.Guidelines for Evaluation of Permanent Physical Impairment of Congenital deficiencies of the limbs

7.Guidelines for Evaluation of Physical Impairments in Neurological conditions

8.Guidelines for Evaluation of Physical Impairment due to Cardiopulmonary

Join the Conversation

1 Comment

Share Your Thoughts...

%d bloggers like this: